<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should &#8220;Motherhood&#8221; Mean No Family Planning?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richelle Monclova</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-11438</link>
		<dc:creator>Richelle Monclova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-11438</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sala de leos...&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.designdemobiliariodeexterior.com Home Projetos Idéias...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sala de leos&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.designdemobiliariodeexterior.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.designdemobiliariodeexterior.com</a> Home Projetos Idéias&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran invites Finklestein to speak at UN &#171; The Word Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran invites Finklestein to speak at UN &#171; The Word Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] again, the very legitimacy of the UN is a big issue at the UN. About a month ago, I reported on a side-event at the UN’s annual Commission on the Status of Women that was co-sponsored by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] again, the very legitimacy of the UN is a big issue at the UN. About a month ago, I reported on a side-event at the UN’s annual Commission on the Status of Women that was co-sponsored by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Slater</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-305</guid>
		<description>At no time in my speech did I say family planning was incompatible with motherhood.  What I did say was that in some cases the family planning agenda has gone too far.  Many nations are struggling to replace their populations and heading toward economic ruin.  If picking on Iran for cosponsoring this event on motherhood is the best you can do then I suggest you pick on every UN related document or event that Iran participates in as well. 

Are you saying that Iran should not be at the UN?  It is at the UN that countries come together to work on issues we all agree on.  Iran is one of the strongest nations in standing up for family values at the UN in harmony with Article16 of the UDHR which says the family is the fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection from society and state.

Are you saying that there is something wrong with nations working together to strengthen this fundamental group unit? 

Who would have thought that there would come a day when  &quot;Recognizing the Critical Role of Mothers&quot; would be considered a negative thing. Most women in the world are mothers and this all important role is underreccognized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At no time in my speech did I say family planning was incompatible with motherhood.  What I did say was that in some cases the family planning agenda has gone too far.  Many nations are struggling to replace their populations and heading toward economic ruin.  If picking on Iran for cosponsoring this event on motherhood is the best you can do then I suggest you pick on every UN related document or event that Iran participates in as well. </p>
<p>Are you saying that Iran should not be at the UN?  It is at the UN that countries come together to work on issues we all agree on.  Iran is one of the strongest nations in standing up for family values at the UN in harmony with Article16 of the UDHR which says the family is the fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection from society and state.</p>
<p>Are you saying that there is something wrong with nations working together to strengthen this fundamental group unit? </p>
<p>Who would have thought that there would come a day when  &#8220;Recognizing the Critical Role of Mothers&#8221; would be considered a negative thing. Most women in the world are mothers and this all important role is underreccognized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-282</guid>
		<description>It is a sad commentary on the state of the world at the UN that only these few countries were willing to publicly suport the value of motherhood.  Do we only value people for their financial compensation levels?  What about the values that mothers communicate to their children? What about their value as individuals and the passing on the culture and traditions of their nations? Really, where would the world be without mothers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a sad commentary on the state of the world at the UN that only these few countries were willing to publicly suport the value of motherhood.  Do we only value people for their financial compensation levels?  What about the values that mothers communicate to their children? What about their value as individuals and the passing on the culture and traditions of their nations? Really, where would the world be without mothers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-281</guid>
		<description>It is a sad commentary on the status of women at the UN that only these few countries were willing to stand up for the value that mothers add to  society. They train the next generation to value themselves as individuals and the culture and traditions of their nation.  Does the rest of the world think your only value comes from your financial compensation level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a sad commentary on the status of women at the UN that only these few countries were willing to stand up for the value that mothers add to  society. They train the next generation to value themselves as individuals and the culture and traditions of their nation.  Does the rest of the world think your only value comes from your financial compensation level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Having heard the speech by the St. Lucian delegate Sarah Flood Beaubrun I was impressed with her answers which are definately so relavent to our Caribbean islands.

Our women and children have been hurt since Independence by the liberal approach to the family and as the research shows contributes immensely to the mayhem in our society and deterioration in the quality of life as we abandon our men and glorify single parent families. 
The attempt to glorify alternative lifestyles to the detrement of our children is also a puzzling thing that I do not quite understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having heard the speech by the St. Lucian delegate Sarah Flood Beaubrun I was impressed with her answers which are definately so relavent to our Caribbean islands.</p>
<p>Our women and children have been hurt since Independence by the liberal approach to the family and as the research shows contributes immensely to the mayhem in our society and deterioration in the quality of life as we abandon our men and glorify single parent families.<br />
The attempt to glorify alternative lifestyles to the detrement of our children is also a puzzling thing that I do not quite understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I was able to attend the event. The panel made some great noteworthy obvious points. I especially was impressed with the insight the Nigerian Panel member shared. In addition,
According to the &quot;World Health Organization&quot;:
In the developed world, the decline in maternal mortality rates coincided &quot;with the development of obstetric techniques and imporovement in the general health status of women&quot; (from 1935 to the 1950&#039;s). 
From my own experiences in Africa: Better medical care, not abortion, is the solution to the problem of maternal deaths in the developing world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to attend the event. The panel made some great noteworthy obvious points. I especially was impressed with the insight the Nigerian Panel member shared. In addition,<br />
According to the &#8220;World Health Organization&#8221;:<br />
In the developed world, the decline in maternal mortality rates coincided &#8220;with the development of obstetric techniques and imporovement in the general health status of women&#8221; (from 1935 to the 1950&#8217;s).<br />
From my own experiences in Africa: Better medical care, not abortion, is the solution to the problem of maternal deaths in the developing world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should “Motherhood” Mean No Family Planning? &#124; TERRAVIVA Beijing +15 &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/should-motherhood-mean-no-family-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Should “Motherhood” Mean No Family Planning? &#124; TERRAVIVA Beijing +15 &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/TV/beijing15/?p=957#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Should “Motherhood” Mean No Family Planning? &#124; TERRAVIVA Beijing +15   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: Should “Motherhood” Mean No Family Planning? | TERRAVIVA Beijing +15   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

