There’s an interesting little spat brewing between Fox News blowhard Bill O’Reilly and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank. Now, I usually like Milbank’s stuff alright — he often makes me laugh (or cry) by detailing hypocrisy in Washington and his old pool reports are the stuff of legend. (No comment on O’Reilly.)
Tangential to this tiff was a discussion of the dangers of reporting in Iran. But both Milbank and O’Reilly are completely off base about what it means for Westerners to report from Iran. It’s high demonization, and the way they bandy about these falsehoods is rather reckless — considering the ramped-up campaign for war with Iran — and disrespectful to those Iranian reporters whose brave reporting puts them at risk from their own government.
While I have no problem with a little humorous sniping — especially at Bill O’Reilly’s expense — one should be aware of what they are talking about. I’ve written before about how making fun of Iran can have the effect of demonizing the country , by placing Iranians in the camp of “the other.” Or as Harvard professor and Foreign Policy blogger Stephen Walt put it, mainstreaming war.
Well, let me break this to you gently, Heidi [the complainer]. If Dana Milbank did in Iran what he does in Washington, he’d be hummus.
Milbank rightfully responded to O’Reilly in a column on Wednesday, putting the latter’s crassness and hypocrisy on hilarious display. But he backed up O’Reilly’s baseless charge about Iran:
O’Reilly is partly right about that. As an American and a Jew, I probably wouldn’t last long in Iran. And criticizing the government there, as I do here, wouldn’t add to my life expectancy. But what was he trying to say? That America would be better if it were more like Iran?
This is hogwash. “As an American,” Milbank would be fine reporting in Iran. Even as a Jew. Even if he criticized the government. Just as another American Jew did: Roger Cohen, the New York Times columnist who broke the rules for foreign reporters, went out on the streets in the middle of the post election turmoil, braved the regime’s brutal crackdown, and reported back for everyone in the West to see what was happening. No one mashed up this particular chic pea. Hummus isn’t even an Iranian dish (far be it for Bill O’Reilly to make distinctions — gastronomical or otherwise — between Muslims in Arab countries and Muslims in Iran).
Cohen, of course, was deported from Iran. But he showed a partisan flair in his reporting and, as I said, violated the terms of his press visa. Other Western journalists who operate within the government’s regulations seem to stay in Iran without much trouble or harassment.
But Cohen’s fate pales in comparison to that of Iranian nationals who blog and report on Iran. Take a look at the Committee to Protect Journalists page for Iran and review the fate of these reporters. It belittles their sacrifice for their country, and for journalism ,when O’Reilly and Milbank make flippant remarks.
- India’s Extensive Railways Often Conduit for Child Trafficking
- Working Together for an Inclusive World
- Global Risks in 2022: The Year of Colliding Consequences
- This Planet Is Drying Up. And these Are the Consequences
- Egypt Racing to Supply Wind, Solar Energy to Greece, EU via Submarine Cables
- Illegal Immigration: A Mounting Global Crisis
- COP 27: A Global COP-Out
- Legal Recognition of East African Sign Languages Key Towards Inclusion
- Three Ways to End Gender-based Violence
- HIV Prevention: New Injection Could Boost the Fight, But Some Hurdles Remain