by Robin Mills
Iran’s oil sector is like an ageing wrestler who could still surprise opponents with a show of strength. With this essential industry currently flat on its back, President Hassan Rouhani’s team has to find a way to get their champion back on its feet. Meanwhile, international oil companies are looking on from the sidelines, and whispering some encouragement.
Iran’s revival would have a significant impact on global oil markets — and, in the longer term, on gas. Oil minister Bijan Zanganeh has predicted exports of 1.4 million barrels per day (bpd) this year, up from 1.15 million bpd in 2013.
Recent reports have indicated that Russia would swap equipment and goods for up to 500,000 barrels per day of Iranian oil, and that Chinese state trader Zhuhai Zhenrong was negotiating for a new contract to purchase condensate (extra-light oil). China currently accounts for about half of Iran’s reduced volume of exports. Although cracks may be appearing in the sanctions edifice, a full and rapid recovery will require the removal of sanctions, not just loopholes.
In such an eventuality, there will have been some permanent loss of capacity because of lack of investment but a re-emergent that Iran might be able to produce around 3.6 million barrels per day, compared to over 4 million bpd in 2010. This would equate to some 1.9 million bpd of exports, almost double current levels. With the US’s Energy Information Administration forecasting the call on OPEC to fall by 0.5 million bpd in 2014, and Iraq likely to grow by 0.3-0.5 million bpd, other OPEC members — notably Saudi Arabia — would have to cut back significantly.
Technically speaking, Iranian oil production might return much quicker than most observers expect. If the fields were shut down in an orderly manner — and the Iranians had plenty of warning — there is no reason why the closure should have permanently damaged them. Quite the opposite: a period of reduced production from some of the old fields may have allowed pressure to recover and more oil to drain into layers from where it can be recovered.
But the process of unpicking the multi-layered sanctions — US, EU and UN — will be lengthy and complicated. Different sanctions cover financial transactions, access by Iran to its overseas funds, trade in precious metals and petrochemicals, investment in the Iranian oil industry, the supply of refined products, the provision of technology, shipping and insurance, imports of Iranian oil by the US or EU, and dealings with numerous designated entities. Some of these sanctions date back well before the current nuclear crisis, and are predicated on support for terrorism or human rights violations.
So even a comprehensive deal over the nuclear program will not remove all sanctions, and certainly not all at once. President Barack Obama may have considerable discretion to waive the application of some sanctions, but it would be disconcerting for long-term buyers to know that a change in the political winds might again cut off Iranian oil at short notice.
To get much beyond 3.6 million bpd of oil output, and to continue the expansion in gas required to meet domestic demand and some ambitious export plans, the industry requires a comprehensive overhaul. Lists released so far seem more of a miscellany of favoured projects, with no clear prioritisation. Given other calls on the government’s budget, in a post-sanctions phase of economic recovery, external financing is likely to be required. Even more than that, international technology and expertise will be key.
With more than a hundred announced projects, the organisational capacity of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) will be tested to the limit, after a long period of brain drain, underinvestment and politicisation. As the experience of Iraq shows — admittedly under less favourable circumstances — effective delivery of multiple megaprojects in collaboration with international oil companies can drag if the state company and ministry lack capability.
Stated priorities include the development of shared fields with Iran’s neighbours – Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE – to avoid hydrocarbons being drained across the international border. It has even been suggested that production-sharing contracts might be offered for such fields – which the international industry prefers to the ‘buybacks’ offered by Iran in the late 1990s, and the technical service contracts used in Iraq.
Iran’s production plans hinge particularly on a few large projects — the Azadegan and Yadavaran oil fields near the Iraqi border, which could produce 900 000 barrels per day; the completion of Phases 12, 15 and 16 of the giant South Pars field; and the Kish and Salman gas fields in the southern Persian Gulf, with potential output of 2.7 billion cubic feet per day, almost a fifth of Iran’s current production.
Salman is a cross-border field with the UAE, and its gas was intended to go to the Emirate of Sharjah, but the deal fell apart over allegations of corruption, under-pricing and Iranian failure to complete infrastructure. Kish has for some years been targeted for export to Oman, which has played a quiet but critical role in behind-the-scenes nuclear diplomacy. Qatar, with whom Iran shares South Pars (Qatar’s North Field), recently offered technical assistance on the field.
But NIOC also needs to consider how to sustain and revive output from its mature fields, including managing massive gas reinjection projects that will take years to show results. At the same time, it needs to explore for new fields with the modern technology and geological concepts that have been so successful just over the border in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Iran has long been working with Chinese companies on Azadegan, Yadavaran, and the Iran LNG (liquefied natural gas) project, part of South Pars. But it has become frustrated by what it sees as their low technical competence and foot-dragging over full-scale investments. Western companies are back in favour. Firms such as ENI and Shell have already, with surprising alacrity, held some discussions with Mr. Zanganeh. During an initial phase of sanctions removal, international companies may seek short-term technical assistance deals — building goodwill and positioning themselves, without making major commitments until they can judge to which side the political tussles, internal and external, incline.
International companies — mostly Western, but also including firms such as Malaysia’s Petronas — bring skills in megaprojects, managing mature fields, and exploration. But Iran should think not only in terms of attracting industry titans — it has plenty of smaller fields where nimble newcomers and private Iranian companies can perform better.
With such assistance, the champion can still return to the fray at something like its former strength. Increased oil output challenges Iran’s Arab neighbours, while gas exports allow it to build ties with the UAE and Oman, as well as with Iraq, Turkey and Pakistan. That will be essential for President Rouhani’s administration, giving his team the muscle to revive the economy. Recapture of the commanding heights of the oil industry and its finances — plundered and obscured under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — is essential in the country’s byzantine factional contests. As usual, this slippery liquid is the way to keep a firm grip on the economy and body politic.
Photo: Iran’s Oil Minister, Bijan Zanganeh
- Rethink Food Security and Nutrition Following Covid-19 Pandemic
- Why Accelerating Implementation of AfCFTA Must Remain a Top Priority
- Nuclear Testing, Never Again
- Cover-up at the UN: You Scratch My Back & I’ll Scratch Yours
- Sustainable Tourism and Fisheries Key to Growth in Post-COVID Pacific
- The Goan Village Women Helping Mitigate Plastic Pollution by Making Eco-friendly Sanitary Pads
- ”Murder Most Foul” – the Death of Olof Palme
- India’s Test along the Line of Actual Control
- Are We Going from San Francisco?
- White House Fenced In: Trump, Within, Ploughs a Lonely Furrow